Just 24 hours after the major announcement was made on Facebook concerning the NEW TOS. The same place where the site owner blew hot air from his facial orifice you know the one he calls his anus, we had Ben exposing his ASS on a cast but then was allowed back on casting barely 24 hours later. It’s hilarious what’s the point of all this and please explain the Terms of Service so maybe someone out there can properly direct casters and viewers. Thank you to those for any screen grabs info or vids.

A quote sent in: “Monkey, saw this post from iVlog and wanted to send to you. Now when I first saw this post it had over 40 comments and now I saw where it has fewer comments at the time I took these screen shots. They’re definitely deleting comments they don’t like.”

A quote sent in by: Can-Cr3am 2019/01/25 at 12:30 am :”There are far too many decent folks banned from iVlog – simply for not kissing the ass of mods. And some incredibly foul characters allowed to run rampant because they bow down and pucker up to the ass of the mods. Nazi Jim’s broadcasts have endorsed all kinds of insane violence – yet he is still allowed on the website.This is essentially being a corrupt organization – when you turn a blind eye to illegal activity as long as it generates you revenue from subscriptions.”

“They are fraudulently misrepresenting themselves in their Terms of Service, and should simply be more up front about things if they are going to be so tyrannical in their approach – if they refuse to be reasonable.Why not just tell people – you cannot criticise the site in any way – or you will be banned? Why not throw in a line about how if you are friends with the site owner you can do whatever the hell you want.”

“They really seem to dislike when it’s pointed out that those who are friends with the site owner have incredible favoritism shown.I think people should continue to emphasis how unbiased ivlog is in their administration of their website – and eventually people will be more cognizant of this issue that could be easily remedied – had they any common sense.”

“The first step would be for the owner to relinquish control of the website’s moderation to a neutral party with experience in moderation of chat rooms – there’s no shortage of seasoned quality moderators on reddit that would do this for free and not be biased in their approach.”

“As long as the owner has a direct role in the website it will be contaminated by their bias, and cronyism.”

A video just sent in by some one who has certain feelings about the site.

Now to be fair to Ben I have no anger or hostility towards him however I do feel the site owner has dropped the ball on this one it may come back to haunt him. But then again I guess that’s what it must be like to be unsound or slow ?